Posted by Happy Jackson on February 20, 2002 at 17:46:22:
In Reply to: photo site posted by mark waldman on February 19, 2002 at 10:14:47:
I can't tell much from the one picture only, but the book appears to consist of lithographs, not woodblock prints. The date on the site is also wrong: Meiji 26, 9th month is 1893, not 1894 as listed. The title sounds strange to me too - could you verify this translation?
: You can see a scan of this book at http://www.woodblockprint.com/os/itemhtml/ht516096.stm
Post a Followup